Newsplaining

US voters want action on global heating. So why are midterm candidates ‘climate hushing’?

RIGHT SO CONTEXT FIRST BECAUSE IT MATTERS BUT APPARENTLY THE AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD IS PAYING TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS EXTRA FOR ENERGY AND MORTGAGE PAYMENTS BECAUSE OF FOSSIL FUEL DEPENDENCY WHICH IS WILD BECAUSE EVERYONE IS ALARMED ABOUT GLOBAL HEATING AND POLLS SHOW VOTERS IN RED AND BLUE BATTLEGROUND STATES WANT ANSWERS BUT CANDIDATES ARE JUST GHOSTING US WHICH IS BASICALLY CLIMATE HUSHING AND EVEN PEOPLE WHO USED TO BE ALL ABOUT GREEN ENERGY LIKE ABDUL EL-SAYED IN MICHIGAN ARE SUDDENLY BACKING AWAY FROM IT BEFORE THE MIDTERMS IN THREE WEEKS AND NO ONE IS TALKING ABOUT THE TRANSITION TO CLEANER STUFF EVEN THOUGH WE JUST HAD A RECORD HOT SUMMER SO CANDIDATES ARE JUST STAYING COMPLETELY SILENT INSTEAD OF ADDRESSING THE CRISIS THAT IS LITERALLY COSTING US THOUSANDS OK BUT ARE YOU SEEING WHAT I AM SEEING?

Voters across the US want midterm candidates to address climate change and rising energy costs, yet politicians from both parties are remaining largely silent on the issue.

Read the whole thing
📰 Read the real story at The Guardian US voters want action on global heating. So why are midterm candidates ‘climate hushing’?

Named in this and it is not fair or not accurate? Write to us — we correct or remove within a few days.