Pete Hegseth’s Bloodlust Doesn’t Hide His Military Failures

NOBODY IS TALKING ABOUT THIS ENOUGH, SO FIRST OF ALL THERE IS THIS NEW PIECE IN THE NEW YORK TIMES ABOUT PETE HEGSETH, AND APPARENTLY, THEY ARE COMING FOR HIS ENTIRE REPUTATION! THE HEADLINE IS LITERALLY SAYING HIS SO-CALLED BLOODLUST IS JUST A SMOKESCREEN FOR ACTUAL MILITARY FAILURES! WHICH IS WILD BECAUSE THIS GUY IS ALWAYS TALKING TOUGH AND NOW THE PAPER OF RECORD IS BASICALLY SAYING HIS RECORD DOES NOT BACK UP THE HYPE! THEY ARE DISSECTING HIS CAREER AND SUGGESTING HE DID NOT EVEN DO WHAT HE CLAIMS, THOUGH I CANNOT TELL YOU THE SPECIFIC MISSIONS BECAUSE THE ARTICLE JUST HINTS AT THE FAILURES! IT IS LIKE THE WHOLE TOUGH-GUY ACT IS CRUMBLING UNDER ACTUAL JOURNALISTIC SCRUTINY RIGHT IN FRONT OF US! OK I NEED A MINUTE, THAT WAS A LOT.

OK THE SHORT VERSION IS THIS: THE NEW YORK TIMES JUST DROPPED AN OPINION PIECE THAT IS ABSOLUTELY ROASTING PETE HEGSETH OVER HIS MILITARY PAST! THEY ARE ALLEGING THAT ALL HIS TOUGH TALK IS JUST A DISTRACTION FROM HIS ACTUAL FAILURES WHILE HE WAS IN UNIFORM! AND THE THING IS, I DO NOT KNOW THE SPECIFIC DETAILS OF WHAT WENT WRONG ON THE GROUND, BUT THIS OP-ED IS DEFINITELY FRAMING HIS CAREER AS A TOTAL DISASTER INSTEAD OF THE SUCCESS STORY HE ALWAYS TELLS! IT IS HONESTLY KIND OF SHOCKING TO SEE THEM GO AFTER SOMEONE LIKE THIS SO DIRECTLY! I HAVE NO IDEA IF THIS IS GOING TO STICK OR IF PEOPLE WILL EVEN CARE, BUT THE FACT THAT THE TIMES IS PUBLISHING THIS AT ALL IS A MAJOR VIBE SHIFT! ANYWAY I WILL BE THINKING ABOUT THIS IN THE TAXI.

The New York Times published an opinion piece criticizing Pete Hegseth, arguing that his public persona of toughness obscures a history of military failures.

Named in this and it is not fair or not accurate? Write to us — we correct or remove within a few days.